**The videos look broken, but I swear they're not lol, just click the play button and you'll hear my amazing voice**
Criterion B: I gave myself a 4 because I talked about the effect of the literary techniques on the passage and the meaning, but I did not relate the effect to the reader.
Criterion C: I gave myself a 3 because my IOC was organized well enough to be mostly coherent, but I think that I could have done a better job of organizing the way I introduced each technique and how I described the passage as a whole.
Criterion D: I gave myself a 3 because my language was good, but it wasn't really elevated. I used sentence structure and tone to analyze the effect as well, but I could have gone more in-depth in my analysis.
Kirami:
ReplyDelete- Bit more context needed- what happened before this passage?
- Like that you looked at structure and comparison
- Glad that you started over, but make sure it doesn't happen over and over :)
- Great ideas presented- well-organized at end when you look at tone, syntax, etc. between the two flashbacks